Skip to main content

The dynamic nature of culture

Intercultural communication typically refers to challenges and corresponding opportunities in communication that occur when people from different cultures meet. In many people’s minds, a static notion of culture prevails based on approaches that explain challenges in intercultural communication through cultural differences linked to national norms described by scholars of comparative intercultural studies (like Hall, Hofstede, Lewis, and Trompenaars).

The identification of cultural differences with norms and values that are supposedly characteristic of the corresponding nationalities from which the leading management of a given multinational company stems generates conclusions whose simplicity is worrying. The resulting classification of cultures according to their degree of individualism versus collectivism or of masculinity versus femininity is so stereotyped and ethnocentric that it can hardly contribute to the study of intracultural and intercultural dynamics. (Dietz, 2018, p. 12)

We no longer live in a world in which every person has only one language and belongs to one culture. In fact, we never did (Blommaert, 1998, p. 9). Culture does not need to “be seen as something which is deposited in every member of a particular society” (Blommaert, 1998, p. 13). Culture has many different meanings and members belong to several different cultures linked to age, gender, religion, socio-economic status, political affiliation, ethnicity, and so on (Deardorff, 2020, p. 5). “Culture is not something we have — a trait — but something we do — a performance“ (Piller, 2017, p. 10). Indeed, it can be made, changed, manipulated, and dropped on the spot (Blommaert, 1998, p. 13). “It is also something that is done to us when others perceive us and treat us as representatives of a particular culture” (Piller, 2017, p. 10). As people are inherently part of multiple cultures associated with various factors such as age, gender, nationality, ethnicity, organisational function, and business field, their cultures are dynamic performances which they experience, shape, alter, and discard at will, while also being influenced by external perceptions and treatment. These dynamic performances, which are manifestations of cultures, are examples of intercultural communication. 

 | Slightly adapted excerpt from the author’s doctoral dissertation: pp. 4-5. |


Cultures are not nationalities; they are fluid identities that emerge in interaction.

https://aiartshop.com/


References

Blommaert, J. (1998, February 27). Approaches to intercultural communication: A critical survey. Expertentagung über Lernen und Arbeiten in einer international vernetzten und multikulturellen Gesellschaft, Universität Bremen, Germany, 27-28 February 1998. Unpublished. http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/2.1.1052.0324

Deardorff, D. K. (2020). Manual for developing intercultural competencies: Story circles. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Dietz, G. (2018). Interculturality. In H. Callan (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (pp. 1–19). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1629 

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.

Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Yale University Press.

Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. and expanded 2nd ed). McGraw-Hill.

Lewis, R. D. (2018). When cultures collide: Leading across cultures (4th ed.). Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural Communication: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business (Rev. and updated 3. ed). Brealey.

Comments